Everyone acts like it's so cheap and unrealistic, but in reality, it's not cheap at all. It's so much easier to throw on an assault rifle and go positive consistently. But god knows it's wrong for someone to be talented enough to go positive quick scoping, amirite? (/sarcasm)
And who cares about realism? Last time I checked, the reason Call of Duty was so addicting wasn't because it was a picture perfect example of what actually happens in the army, but because you can jump right in and do whatever you want with no consequences.
I'm not an avid quickscoper, however, I do enjoy picking up a sniper every once in a while, but whenever I do manage to get a nice little streak quickscoping, everyone automatically hates on me, saying that I'm cheap or have no skill, so, could someone tell me what exactly does make quickscoping cheap? And only serious answers, please.
Oh, and thanks you, Treyarch, for patching the Famas. Finally some justice :P
And who cares about realism? Last time I checked, the reason Call of Duty was so addicting wasn't because it was a picture perfect example of what actually happens in the army, but because you can jump right in and do whatever you want with no consequences.
I'm not an avid quickscoper, however, I do enjoy picking up a sniper every once in a while, but whenever I do manage to get a nice little streak quickscoping, everyone automatically hates on me, saying that I'm cheap or have no skill, so, could someone tell me what exactly does make quickscoping cheap? And only serious answers, please.
Oh, and thanks you, Treyarch, for patching the Famas. Finally some justice :P